“We must speak with all
the humility that is appropriate to our limited vision, but we must speak.”
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., April 1967
Obama has made his last State of the Union speech, and of
course he reports that the union is strong. When was the last time an American
president claimed otherwise? Obama might have told the truth and admitted that
the union is troubled, unequal, and full of discontented, frightened citizens,
but that would make him a leader rather than a politician dedicated to
preserving the status quo.
And one key to preserving the status quo is to repeat myths,
half-truths, and of course, outright, bald-faced lies. Thus, the state of our
union is strong and the wars we wage are just; our enemies are evil, hell-bent
on our destruction; the economy is humming along (even if all the gains go to
the wealthy); Americans are the chosen people, the last best hope for the world,
etc.
Don’t get me wrong, I enjoy a good political speech (although I
passed on this one) and without doubt Obama is a gifted orator. After all, his
rhetorical gift is what brought him to
widespread attention in 2004, and his ability on the stump was one
reason he captured the presidency only four years later. The problem with Obama
is that his actions and policies rarely measure up to his rhetoric.
Obama began abandoning the voters who got him to the White
House the minute his first Inaugural address was over. People forget that Obama
surrounded himself with Clinton-era retreads, and awful, deceitful people like
Timothy Geithner, or corporate workhorses like Eric Holder. This was a clear
signal, very early on, about whose interests Obama was looking after.
The rich and powerful never had anything to fear from the Obama
Administration.
I voted for the man, only the one time, and within a year was
totally disillusioned. Like millions of others, I had been duped by the
rhetoric.
How will history measure Obama’s presidency? That depends of
course on who tells the tale. For instance, Obama is given credit by many
mainstream types for being the president who got Osama bin Laden. Some accounts
are so rah-rah they make it seem that it was Obama himself who stormed bin
Laden’s compound and shot the arch terrorist dead. Let’s get real for a minute.
The US invaded Afghanistan in late 2001, quickly overran the Taliban and
supposedly had bin Laden cornered in the Tora Bora mountains, only to see him
escape into the hinterlands and vanish -- for ten years! -- despite being the
most wanted man in the world, target #1 of the FBI, CIA, NSA, DIA, NSC and
Naval Intelligence. And here’s the kicker: for much of those 10 years, bin
Laden’s whereabouts were known to our staunch ally in the War on Terror,
Pakistan. Why did this heroic execution take so long?
And how about Obama’s doublespeak when it comes to government
transparency? He claimed that his administration would be the most open and
transparent in history -- until information leaked and then Obama showed his
true colors, unleashing the full force and power of the government against
whistleblowers and journalists like Jeffrey Sterling and James Risen.
History will, or should, record that Obama was for a time Executioner
in Chief, deciding who would die by remote-controlled drone strike in the
badlands of Yemen, Afghanistan or Pakistan, without formal charges ever being
filed, without trial or any kind of due process. Perhaps some of the selected
targets were terrorists, but many were not, and in either case, innocents were
murdered. If any nation on this planet (except Israel, of course, which can
pretty much murder whoever it wants without consequence) arrogated to itself
the right to murder people beyond its own borders, the United States would
bellow to the heavens about international law and sovereign territory. In other
words, we would have a shit fit.
Obama frittered away his congressional majorities in his first
term. He had a window of time to act boldly, but he choose to act cautiously;
he allowed his political opponents to seize control of the national agenda. And
then he lost his majorities and with them any hope of getting much done against
a dysfunctional Congress. Granted, Obama got the Affordable Care Act done, but
if this doesn’t lead to a single-payer system like Medicare for all -- the only
sensible, equitable, humane system --
Obama’s victory is hollow.
Since the nation is celebrating the birthday of Dr. Martin
Luther King, it may be instructive to examine Obama’s accomplishments through
the lens of the three evils MLK enumerated not long before he was gunned down:
militarism, poverty, and racism. The War on Terror is now in its 15th year.
Along with Iraq, Libya and Syria are in ruins. Obama has prosecuted the war
with fervor, backpedaled on his promise to end the American occupation of
Afghanistan (we’re still there) and as of this writing, failed to close our
offshore penitentiary at Guantanamo. I will say that Obama deserves credit for
negotiating a nuclear agreement with Iran. While it seems hypocritical to me
that Israel is allowed to stockpile nuclear weapons, and Iran is sanctioned for
its peaceful nuclear program, it was right to engage Iran rather than isolate
Iran.
Income inequality has not lessened under Obama, not that it
could since he has essentially followed the same economic policies as his
predecessor. The gap between wealthy and poor,
haves and have nots, continues to widen, with more and more wealth --
and power -- concentrating in fewer hands. The middle class is on life support.
Although the government reports that millions of jobs have been created during
Obama’s term, we should ask for details about those jobs. Are they permanent or
temporary, full time or part time, do they provide fringe benefits, and what do
they pay -- a living wage or a precarious one?
Obama claimed early in his presidency that we had entered a
post-racial era. Wrong. Racism is alive and well in America, and even Obama
himself has been the target of racial animus and disrespect. The numbers of
young African-American males shot and killed by white policemen on the streets
of this country are striking. Black lives remain cheap and disposable; more
often than not, despite evidence and testimony, white police officers walk away
from fatal shootings, scot free.
From now until he leaves the White House for a financially
lucrative post-residency, Obama and his people will devote themselves to
burnishing his image. There will be a library and a foundation, books and
speeches. The reality of Obama’s time in office will never measure up to the
PR, and by MLK’s standards, his legacy is mixed indeed.