Tuesday, August 28, 2012

The Fall of our Discontent



“The United States has entered a new historical era marked by a growing disinvestment in the social state, public goods, and civic morality.”  Henry Giroux

I can’t bear to watch the Republican National Convention, and when I heard Ralph Reed spinning a fable about thousands of nuclear centrifuges in Iran on Democracy Now on the radio this morning, I immediately switched the channel.

I’ve heard enough lies. The Republican Party is a monstrosity, full of zealots with zero respect for facts, science, history or rational inquiry. Their kit bag is loaded with tired and failed prescriptions, from tax cuts as a job generator to blind support of Israel, from deranged hostility to the public sector to opposition to abortion under any circumstances. Their belief in fairy tales is absolute and no amount of reason, data, or experience can sway them. If it would further their political power, they would happily run our ship of state aground.

The obstructionist GOP will nominate the human cipher, Mitt Romney, and his running mate, Paul Ryan. Romney seems to believe that his enormous personal wealth entitles him to the presidency, that his experience in the private sector makes him an expert in macroeconomics, and that the sprawling federal government can be run like IBM or Exxon-Mobil. Ryan is touted as a federal budget prodigy, but as Paul Krugman and others have pointed out, Ryan’s math is fuzzy. Given his way, Ryan would shred what little remains of the American social safety net and hand even larger tax breaks to people who least need them. Under Ryan’s prescriptions, the rich would become richer, the poor more so, and the gap between the two even wider than it is today.

Romney is the wind-up candidate, a politician who offers whatever audience he appears before whatever he thinks they want in the moment. Tonight he’s for marriage equality, tomorrow morning he’s against it. Looking in at Romney one sees no hint of soul or character, and he can hardly be regarded as a mirror of who the majority of us are.

I imagine the word “socialist” will be heard frequently this week in heavily guarded, Homeland Security-occupied Tampa. That the Right has affixed this label to Obama is a signature propaganda achievement since by no objective measure can any of Obama’s policy initiatives be called socialist. 

The Right will never admit the truth, but in Obama the status quo has had a devoted servant.

As Thomas Frank writes in the September issue of Harper’s:

“What Barack Obama has saved is a bankrupt elite that by all rights should have met its end in 2009. He came to the White House amid circumstances similar to 1933, but proceeded to rule like Herbert Hoover.”

I admit to drinking several pints of Obama’s Kool-Aid in 2008. Exhausted after eight years of the Bush-Cheney junta, I fell for the rhetoric of hope and change and fully suspended my critical faculties. Only after Obama surrounded himself with a posse of Clinton-era operatives did I realize how completely I had been duped. In my mind, the trip has been all down hill from there. Obama frittered away the first half of his term when he had majorities in Congress, allowed the right to take control of the national narrative, and failed to use his bully pulpit to advance policies that might have benefitted the middle class and working poor. The country needed a fighter with a tough chin; what we got was a compulsive compromiser.

I won’t watch the Democratic National Convention either, since the contemporary Democratic Party doesn’t represent my interests. As a matter of conscience I might not vote at all come November.

I don’t think I’m alone in feeling that it really makes no difference. 

No comments: